Blocking out the WordPress future… and it’s Gutenberg

I took the plunge a couple of weeks back and dived in to the new WordPress block-editor, which they’ve called Gutenberg, after Johannes Gensfleisch zur Laden zum Gutenberg (1400 – 1468) who invented the printing press for the west. This post is written using the new system.

I didn’t do this lightly. My main irritation with software is the way that developers keep chopping and changing established systems, at times purely – it seems – because of the commercial need to present novelty, an issue that reflects not just money but also market share and attention. Familiar ways of doing things get thrown aside and users are forced into learning curves that stifle productivity.

Another gripe is the way that we’re slaves to whatever parameters and capabilities the corporate masters of the programmers deem we should have; we work in the way focus-groups and social engineers insist we must, or we hit the highway. That’s inevitable, given the nature of it: software is a tool, and each program has its features. You can’t make a hammer turn into a ruler or a saw. But it still annoys me to hit limits that somebody else has built into a system because of their own philosophy – these days an ‘averaged-corporate’ one – which doesn’t take account of individual approaches. Especially mine, but hey…

On the other hand, often a major change introduces something that is incredibly useful and amazing. So I am both excited and wary about anything new. Enter 2019. Enter Gutenberg.

It didn’t take me long to figure out how Gutenberg works; I’ve worked with block editors before – essentially, they are front ends for HTML coding – and this one was pretty much in the same league. It’s also straight-forward, and intentionally so I suppose. It didn’t take me long – maybe half an hour – to run some tests and figure out how to do about 80 percent of the stuff I’d been doing in other ways previously. I expect I’ll discover other stuff as I go along.

Once I’d come to grips with what Gutenberg could do, it also didn’t take me long to spot people using it. Drop-cap, for example, is a nice classic typographical effect for an opening paragraph that I like. Such beasties are possible with HTML, but fiddly. The block editor does them with a switch that applies per-block.

WordPress’ engineers have also made swathes of text colour easy to achieve, per block. This is another thing possible in HTML via hex code, and quite flexibly if you do it the hard way. With hard-coding using hex values, you can apply colour letter by letter. Gutenberg’s user-friendly UI doesn’t support that degree of fidelity, but if you dig under the hood, you can still apply custom HTML coding. However, most users don’t. So I’ve seen posts with whole blocks of coloured text, often switching from colour to colour (hex number #00ff00 to you… which because of the general style applied by the blog theme I’m using might appear as lower-case o’s on some systems and configurations, but actually they’re zeroes. Just saying).

Personally I find main-text colour switching a bit irritating from a reader perspective, though I guess it’s inevitable that people will use the up-front capabilities of any new piece of software. I still remember, years ago, when Adobe InDesign came out with an easy way to add drop-shadow to anything. Instantly, designers were creating a ‘drop-shadow’ look everywhere. (Don’t get me started on Photoshop layer blend options and modern book covers…)

A wonderful quote from Katherine Mansfield. On a block – this one made of concrete.

So yeah, I just picked up WordPress’s Gutenberg and barrelled on with nary a pause. Partly it’s because I speak geek fairly well, and I’ve been working professionally in the writing/editing/publishing business for over (cough cough) 35 years, one way and another. I’ve seen a lot of software roll past and in that sense, this is just another one. My main gripe is that the scheduling feature doesn’t mark up a ‘future calendar’ of where posts are going to appear, as the old did. Or maybe it does, and my software doesn’t display it because I am a total paranoid about security settings.

However, in general, I’d say Gutenberg is easier to use and more versatile than its predecessor. Up until now, a fair number of my posts have been composed in a word processor and pasted into WordPress’s older text editor for final styling and illustrating. But with Gutenberg, maybe I’ll start composing more blog posts natively in it. We’ll see.

Have you tried it out yet? What were your experiences?

Copyright © Matthew Wright 2018


29 thoughts on “Blocking out the WordPress future… and it’s Gutenberg

  1. Yeah, I’m with you. I dislike change for the sake of change that causes the user suffering. I’ve been using it for weeks and wasn’t pleased to discover it’d arrived when I was trying to post to the blog before work and didn’t have much time. I learned enough to make it through that morning and since then I’ve adapted until I don’t have a problem with it, though I miss the list of most used tags (it remembers the ones you’ve used, but doesn’t show the list). Brainstorming early in the morning before my brain has awoken from its slumber doesn’t work well. Guess I’ll make my own list. I suspect they did that to cut down on the number of tags people use. If you have to think of them each time you’ll use fewer.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I agree, the new tagging system looks to me like an attempt to reduce tag-spamming. I seem to recall, back when I started, that there was actually a max number the system would allow – any more than that and it would actively not use them. I’m not sure if that’s still the case today.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I’d have stuck with the old for longer too (not least because the new, inevitably these days, is ‘half finished’ on release) – kind of got into Gutenberg over Christmas when too much fumbling on my tablet screen led to starting it up. So I figured I’d have to learn it some time… why not the holidays? I don’t think it’s better than the old editor, just different.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I have not tried it yet, Matthew. I, too, am using the old text editor and am loathe to give it up. It’s not that I doubt I will figure it out, although I am not a geek (wish I were) but I have been with WordPress for seven years so I have manipulated a feature or two. I’m sorry about the tags no longer being visible but I’ll just have to be better at remembering. 😉 I never have composed a blog post in WordPress; do let me know how that goes, when you do. I will probably wait until the last minute before switching to Gutenberg, although I really like the name, or maybe I will get adventurous with one of my blogs and try it sooner than later.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I ended up jumping prematurely – I was away for Christmas with only my tablet for web access and didn’t have the finesse of control that I do on my desktop machine. As a result of being a klutz with touchscreens, I ended up firing up the new editor & figured, whatever, I’ll give it a go. It’s OK but I definitely miss the tagging visibility, as you do. It’s also missing a key scheduling feature I always used – it doesn’t mark on the forward calendar when a post is scheduled, as the old did, which is annoying.

      What I can say is that it accepts material pasted from Word and turns it correctly into blocks, preserving the formatting (mostly) including endnotes. I compose virtually all of my posts in Word. Small mercies!

      Liked by 1 person

        1. Easier than the old system. Each image has its own block which can be adjusted for text wrap. The system for assigning a URL to an image on clicking also seems friendlier. Still takes getting used to but I definitely ‘grok’ what WordPress programmers were getting at with this aspect. Not so sure about some of the other features but I guess that’s software for you!

          Liked by 1 person

          1. I really like the idea of the text wrap for each block. I’m used to that from my newspaper days, which obviously dates me. And I’m for anything that is friendlier. Thanks, Matthew!

            Liked by 1 person

  3. Sheer obstinacy is stopping me from trying Gutenberg, but I have to admit that I’ve used block editors before – on Medium. They’re okay, but I found the Medium one a wee bit simplistic. I’ve always composed directly into WordPress using the /old/ editor, not the dumbed down new one, so I like the level of control. When Gutenberg supplies something the old editor can’t, I’ll make the change. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I haven’t found anything superior to the old in the block editor yet apart from some minor cosmetic matters such as colours and block caps… and there is a lot that it either doesn’t do, which the old did. Or maybe they’ve just hidden the functionality somewhere.

      Like

      1. Yeah, I thought that might be the case. Interestingly, I’ve noticed that the old one now has colour, and you don’t have to know html to provide clever links – blah blah So I’m really struggling to see the carrot. Just hope there is no stick.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I guess that will arrive when the classic system is closed off. It always peeves me a little when I realise the extent to which we as users are prisoners to the tools we use.. and to the ideas of the tool makers. I guess historically this was always true but the nature of computing has really highlighted it.

          Like

          1. Totally agree. 😦 I’ve been blogging on WordPress since December, 2011 and I have positively HATED some of the so-called ‘improvements’. I managed to hang on to the classic dashboard, but I know I’m one of the few. It’s always a hard balancing act for devs, I know that, but there’s no point dumbing the interface down so much that they lose bloggers as soon as they become serious about blogging.

            Liked by 1 person

  4. Like you, I’ve started using it and can do most of what I want (which is pretty basic stuff). Those drop-caps are HUGE, so you need at least a 4-line paragraph to carry them well. And even though it might be fun to give each paragraph its own background colour, I’ve resisted doing that for the most part.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes, it would be nice to have some control over the size of the drop cap – it’s annoying to have to adjust the first paragraph length purely for asethetic reasons. I’ve carefully avoided colouring my paragraphs too.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I feel the same as you. Why didn’t they allow you to add blocks into classical posts, so that you could get the best of both worlds? Software inventors always want to create something new. Over many years of various experiences of IT, they are never as aware as they should be of making the transition to their wonderful new system easy – and there are usually glitches with the early versions, as there are with Gutenberg.

    Having said that, some of the features are great, notably easy columns.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Nice post. I’ve always hated change in any area of my life, so I won’t be using the new editor until I’m forced to. It’s not that I’m too too dumb to figure it out, it’s just that I like the editor the way it is now. Creature of habit I guess. And I write my posts in the editor – I don’t use external editors. The current, soon-to-be-old, editor has so many features that I enjoy.
    As for changing the text colors, why would anyone want to do that except for links and maybe quotes? Black text on a white background is the norm and what folks expect to see. It also has a purpose for those who are color-blind. I don’t see the need for this.
    Anyways, thanks for sharing your experience 🙂

    Like

    1. Yes, I’m not sure what the functionality of coloured text is either. It’s not usually done in the print world, and for good asethetic and practical reasons – as you point out.

      Like

    1. I figure half the struggle is trying to figure out the organising principle that the programmer had in mind. Usually it’s this that makes software difficult to learn. But then they keep changing it – which is frustrating.

      Like

  7. I have used it a few times already and feel frustrated at times when things don’t fall into place. It is definitely a learning curve. I guess I will get through it eventually with some trial and error. Hopefully they won’t throw something else in to mix things up.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I find it does a few things well that previously had been frustrating, which is handy – but it also has its own frustrations and some of the functionality I used to rely on with the old system has gone altogether. I am never quite sure why things that aren’t broken keep getting fixed by software makers. This idea that it is a ‘service’ rather than a ‘finished product’ seems counter-productive to me, longer term. When I was first using computers the whole idea was that if you got a stable system, don’t then mess with it. Today, messing with it appears to be the business model! And the poor end-user wears it. Sigh…

      Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.