We’ve missed our utopian future

Back in the 1950s and 1960s the popular vision of the 2020s was simple. The future was defined as the turn of the millennium; the 2020s were the future of the future, and this nebulous future future had every potential to fix humanity’s problems. By the 2020s all disease would be conquered. We’d have climate control. All social issues would be resolved. Oh, and apparently we’d also have flying cars, self-aware computers and Mars bases.

It was a utopian vision. Still, when I look around at the world today, beset with a pandemic that has served to intensify the social disruption provoked by social media; beset with the the end-stage social outcomes of neo-liberalism; confronted by climate change that we triggered – but where major nations won’t stop doing the things that make it worse; and where AI is mainly a set of algorithms cynically designed to allow corporates to make more profit from social media, I can’t help thinking about the optimism of the mid-twentieth century idealism that portrayed a better world. It really was utopian.

A beautiful picture of Earth from 1.6 million km sunwards. NASA, public domain.

Utopianism isn’t new, of course – nor is cynicism about humanity’s ability to achieve it. The word itself was coined by Sir Thomas Moore in 1516 to describe just such a failure.

Why was cynicism not widespread about the 1960s vision at the time? I put it down to optimism. There was a period in the mid-20th century where technology had leaped ahead and the potential for a better future really did seem unlimited. It was an illusion caused in part by the fact that, just then, a whole lot of new technologies were in their infancy and the limits weren’t fully appreciated. As one example, in 1945 jet engines transcended the speed possible with piston aircraft, and rockets were on the horizon. There was talk of routine supersonic travel, rocket-planes to orbit and more. What actually happened was that jets had only certain potential and rocket-planes remained experimental. Things plateaued. In fact a typical jet airliner today is a bit slower than the original Boeing Model 367-80 that first flew in 1954 – but way safer and more efficient.

Equally, the ‘conquest’ of disease failed. I believe smallpox exists only in labs these days and other traditional killers are minimised. But many older diseases haven’t been conquered, new diseases have arrived – Covid, obviously, but also an epidemic of cancer, diabetes and auto-immune disorders. Apparently the social inequities caused by neo-liberal policies that create a new urban poor have also led to inadequate health-care and a rise in older diseases long thought beaten, including tuberculosis, scarlet fever and (wait for it) bubonic plague – that’s right. Black Death, which was recently found in California, Colorado and New Mexico, as an example. But in any case, despite sporadic efforts, ‘disease conquest’ was only a First World benefit anyway.

And there was no sign of being able to control the climate. Well, we’ve shown that our civilisation has had profound effect on climate. But not by design or, indeed, intent.

As for social utopia? When I look at the mess our world is in, I am moving more and more to the idea that human civilisation has outstripped our hard-wired nature. This was formed when our species consisted of bands of around 150 individuals (the ‘Dunbar number’) and doesn’t work in communities of large urban and national scales.

I miss the vision of the 1960s. And the flying cars. Well, actually not the flying cars, Because Reasons. Other than that, a disease-free social utopia where it only rained at night would be quite nice about now.

What’s your take on it all? Tell me in the comments.

Copyright © Matthew Wright 2022

Advertisement

19 thoughts on “We’ve missed our utopian future

  1. On the shelf behind me is The Official Guide to the New York World’s Fair of 1964/65. I’m not quite sure how I ended up with it given I was so little at the time my memories are but a few and brief. What did stick with me was the utopian vision of the future that’s on every page (believe it or not, 312 pages). Relics of the fair remain and the US Open is played on its grounds these days. Looking back at all the pavilions funded by the corporate giants of the time, I know that it was all a lie. Yet, I still can’t let go of the spirit of the vision. These days, though, my personal, updated version doesn’t contain those corporations that used hope against us—and still do.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I guess the ‘future vision’ of corporates at the time – as it is today – was a place where everybody would buy their products. But as you say, there was a spirit in the vision which transcended the bottom line of the balance sheet. Sure, everybody would own products made by (say) Ford or IBM… but they’d own them while living on the Moon. When I think about it, I guess the seeds of the destruction of this optimism were already around in the 1960s, especially through the social and fiscal impact of the Vietnam war. In general, nobody predicted how things would actually go – still less how technology would swing away from a future with mega-cities, mid-century modern googie architecture on giant scales and so forth, into electronics and communications. I say ‘in general’ intentionally – one guy exactly predicted not just this development, but also the social impact: Arthur C. Clarke. Here’s a 1964 clip in which he nailed today’s world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w8w8b1gEuI – this said, he was still very optimistic in terms of the social outcomes, I suspect.

      Liked by 3 people

  2. It’s great to look back to the past and see all of the achievements and failures we have endured from brilliant men and women and the cons and dirty deeds done by people in high places.
    We are in denial about climate change and are blaming this on farting cattle and burning coal when the main protagonist in this equation is the human race with the burning desire to overload our small planet with humans. The nightly ads on TV show the starving children in many overseas countries, with pleas for donations to fix this problem by providing food by people, who in most cases create a large income for themselves, without any thought for these starving children.
    Regardless of what the religious leaders say to the masses, we need a worldwide birth control education and incentives for many of these people who have had many children.
    I feel for the displaced families who were made to try to survive from war, like the people in the Middle East who were made to flee by the decision of the Bush regime who were looking for oil and selling arms. the infrastructure of many of these countries has been ruined by greed by greedy people. Other counties have the same dirty deed portrayers, like Hitler, Mussolini, and many others with the same aim. World domination.
    In My thoughts are a plan to offer incentives to people to stop randomly having families of ten children or more, just to see them die of starvation
    I believe in not too many years we will see huge problems with the world not being able to feed itself. I think of the world as a large field on a farm that has a permanent water supply which every year runs two hundred sheep without supplementary feeding. If the other of this field were to place six hundred sheep in this field without supplementing the feed and water, then nearly all of the sheep would die from lack of feed. Think about this very deeply. In years to come, there will be wars to obtain more food. The rich will slaughter the meek. They will inherit the earth by laying dead on top of it.

    Like

  3. Is it possible the dream was fed on the wants of the planet and not simply on the needs. The use of hope for a better world was driven by the core desire of hope for each individual getting only what they wanted, not what the world needed. Every problem could have been solved if attention had been given to researching and resolving rather than financially driven profit margins. Even the major organisations today have failed so many of their own employees. Social conscience has been realigned to artificial extremes, many without any beneficial purpose to a society. We have failed to look after this non-replacable resource poorly. Hindsight.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. So true. There is much about the way today’s society works – the assumptions on which ‘normality’ is based – that, if we look closer, flow not from human values but those of profit and self-interest. To be expected, I suppose, after two generations of neoliberalism. But it isn’t enduring, and what worries me is that the longer it persist, the harder the crash will be.

      Like

  4. I remember those days and the at times heady optimism for humanity. Indeed we have come a long way but also regressed in many ways and I believe most of that regression can be blamed on greed and fear. Why anyone wants more than 1 home, throws out food because it may be stale or you don’t want to eat the same thing again, 2 people live in a 4 bedroom home etc. etc. is beyond me but that greed and entitlement has bewitched us and in turn is killing our planet and us along with it. Sorry for the rant!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’re rant is justified. I couldn’t agree more.

      I have my cozy place and am quite happy in it. I’m also keenly aware of the ranks of the homeless in this city, yet they build condos and storage facilities. People fill their basements, attics, and garages with things and then purchase storage units (yes, some are for other needs). When did the virtue that was saving become spending?

      Instead of products that last, people purchase the latest model each year, even if they must go into debt to do it. I purchased a phone in 2013 and replaced it last year. The girl who waited on me was shocked I wanted to pay for the new one in-full and pleaded that I finance. I asked why I’d do that when it wasn’t necessary? Her reply was that I could take the money set aside and spend it on something else. In other words, spend the saved money AND pay interest. I told her that I don’t do debt unless necessary, but, in truth, I wanted to hug her and tell her it wasn’t too late to stop treating debt like Monopoly money. To think that her electronics knowledge was considerable.

      So, yes, instilled greed and the fear of not having enough is real. There’s also a hint of 1920s financial recklessness. How appropriate that in the US most of the safeguards that kept that from happening again have been removed.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. No question that 1920s financial recklessness is happening again. The financial side of what’s going on is simply mind-blowing in its absurdity. I was working in central bank communications through the GFC and it was like watching a slow-mo train wreck. With considerable difficulty, the west literally bought itself out of the coming second Great Depression. But it didn’t change the behaviours and habits that had led to this situation – the complete lack of proper regulation relative to the financial markets, in particular. Now we’re facing a worse crisis, and nobody seems to know or care – they’re just carrying on with their financial ‘products’, inflating the price of things that have no real existence and then trading them, and so forth. It can only end one way, and it’s going to be ugly.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. You’ve articulated so well what I think about often. We held on to our naive idealism for so long. Optimism. Hope. Expectations that things just couldn’t really go off the rails. Ignoring signals. Then we wake up and realize that our idealism has been dashed. Maybe it’s because we can no longer cling to naivety? The damage we’ve done to our planet and each other is impossible to ignore. Our apparent inability to put the needs of others ahead of our own is front and centre. 😥

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think you’re right – humanity is ultimately selfish. A large part of the issues facing us today can be traced to the selfishness of the rich and of corporates, and their unwillingness to let go what they have. I suspect it’s a product of human nature in general: the hard-wired behaviours that worked for hunter-gatherer times simply fail in large-scale societies. To really fix the problems that destroy our utopian dreams, as a species, humanity needs to first fix those issues.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Re flying cars…I suspect your Reasons are probably the same as mine, but let’s not go there.
    I’m actually a little more sanguine than you at the moment. Assuming we don’t kill ourselves off [Russia, I’m looking at you], and assuming the pandemic eventually ends, I suspect neo-liberalism won’t matter as much because the winners from this pandemic will be the Asian countries and /they/ will surge ahead while the West slowly stagnates. Given that Oz and NZ are part of Asia [whether our leaders want to believe it or not], I think we’ll be forced to change. Whether that change leads to a new golden age or second class citizenship is anyone’s guess. I did try to find out, but my crystal ball has cracks in it. 😉
    ‘We live in interesting times.’

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Optimistically I think humanity will puddle through, but the ‘world as we know it’ will likely change. What interests me has been the pace at which things change. History doesn’t strictly run in ‘cycles’ (certainly not in the sense of Spengler or even Kondratiev) but it’s clear that there are large-scale shifts from time to time, usually socially driven and leading to societies with distinctive forms. I remember learning about the ‘medieval’ period (divided into early medieval and ‘high medieval’ periods), followed by the Early Modern Period, followed by ‘Modern’. But ‘modern’ (held to start in the late 18th century) itself divides into two significant phases, marked by the fall of the European ‘old order’ with the First World War. And now we’re heading into another and similarly large shift. Society seems to be changing at an accelerating rate.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I would like to think that this nexus in time will lead to a second Enlightenment [in the West], but my gut feel is that it won’t. The Renaissance grew out of individuals breaking free from the strictures of the past. I know that’s a gross generalisation, but to me, it seems as if the Asian countries are the ones ripe for an Enlightenment. They’ve gone through their ‘fallow’ centuries and now life is full of possibilities again.
        By contrast, Western culture feels old and tired. Maybe I’m jaded by our response to the pandemic. I don’t know, but it seems as if we’re no longer capable of the levels of co-operation needed for cultural growth. -shrug-
        Apologies. Clearly I haven’t had enough coffee yet this morning. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

  7. For the most part, I’m still optimistic about the future. Humanity has made enormous progress in the last century or so, but whenever you make progress you are, almost by definition, doing something new and untested. We’re bound to make mistakes and run into unanticipated problems.

    That’s not to say I’m not worried. In the short term, I think that things are going to get worse before they get better. But in time, I do think things will get better and something like those 1950’s/1960’s Sci-Fi utopias may still be possible.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. My worry is that humanity has painted itself into a corner and shows little willingness to make the change necessary to get out of it: economically and socially. A case of the ‘haves’ being unprepared to let go what they’ve got, I suspect. It’s good to be optimistic, and I think humanity has the potential to produce a better world – even the utopia of the 1960s – but we have to stop being prisoners of our own natures first.

      Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.